World Diamond CouncilEli Izhakoff, Chairman / 580 Fifth Avenue / New York, NY 10036 / USA

WORLD DIAMOND COUNCIL 2ND ANNUAL MEETING
MILAN ~ MARCH 12-13, 2002
The Diamond Industry and the demands of the 21st
CenturySelf Regulation
Chairman, De Beers Group
Mr. Chairman, leaders of the international diamond industry, esteemed
guests from government, civil society and the media. Thank you for inviting me to address you here today. On behalf of us all, may I begin by thanking
Dr. Gaetano Cavaleiri, President of CIBJO, for hosting this gathering here in
Milan.
This, the third full meeting of the World Diamond Council, is of the
greatest importance for our industry and resonates far beyond our immediate
commercial interests and concerns.
Assembled here today are distinguished representatives from each and every
part of our unique industry. United in
one purpose: helping to bring to an end the insidious trade in conflict
diamonds.
Under the skilful leadership of Eli Izhakoff, the WDC now commands
respect on the international stage and is recognised as the official voice of the industry. However, I am sure Eli would be the first to remind me that this
could not have been accomplished without the support of the many organisations
that form the WDC, and of the many individuals within our industry who have
given their time and commitment.
In particular, Matt Runci and Cecilia Gardner have demonstrated
outstanding dedication and hard work in supporting Eli and helping to achieve
the objectives set out before the Council.
Mark van Bockstael deserves the thanks of us all for his invaluable
technical input. From De Beers, I must commend the role played by Rory More
O’Ferrall and his dedicated conflict team, together with Blackie Marole,
Barbara Masekela and Andy Coxon, now of De Beers LV.
Above all, however, I pay special tribute to the leaders of the World
Federation of Diamond Bourses and the International Diamond Manufacturers
Association, Bram Fischler and Sean Cohen, without whose vision the WDC would
not exist at all. They, with Shmuel Schnitzer of the Israel Diamond Exchange,
Uri Schwartz of the Israeli Diamond Manufacturers Association and Bumi Traub of
the Kidum, Charlie Bornstein and Peter Meeus of the HRD, the Indian Gem and
Jewellery Council, led by its Chairman, Sanjay Kothari, the representatives of
the American diamond industry, Jacob Banda and Jeffrey Fischer, and Ernie Blom,
representing the South African diamond merchants, are the key to the successful
implementation of the industry’s measures of self-regulation.
There are many others here from the producers, the diamond banks, the
trade press, from Russia, China, Botswana, Namibia, Australia, the Democratic
Republic of Congo and from Canada – I am sure you will forgive me for not
naming you each individually – who have each made their own contribution and
will continue to play a vital role.
The creation of the World Diamond Council was a daring and innovative
move not without risks. This is an
industry made up of many competitive and disparate companies and organisations. What the creation of the Council has shown,
however, is that we are able to unite behind a just and challenging cause,
joining governments and the international community in the Kimberley Process
and in the fight against conflict diamonds.
We must continue our efforts to bring the trade in conflict diamonds to
an end. Not just because it has the
potential to damage our industry and the integrity of diamonds, but because it is right to do so. We are the
leaders of the industry and have a clear duty to the societies in which we
operate to act, and act effectively.
As leaders, we must continue our efforts because we also have a
responsibility to the more than 2 million people around the world, many of them
in developing countries, whose livelihoods depend on the survival and
prosperity of the legitimate diamond industry.
An industry that has shown itself ready to carry out its business in a
transparent and responsible way.
It has been said before – and I am happy to repeat it today – that it
is without precedent that a global industry has collaborated with the United
Nations, governments and civil society to address a major humanitarian issue in
this way. Although the Kimberley
Process is convening once again in Ottawa to refine some of the detail of the
proposed measures, the fact that together
we reached consensus in Gaborone at the end of last year is a remarkable
achievement.
Let us celebrate that achievement, and then redouble our determination
to complete the task.
From the industry’s perspective, the first prize would be for the
Kimberley Process to be elevated to the status of a UN Security Council
Resolution – that would not only make its provisions binding on nations and
individuals, but would also transcend World Trade Organisation and GATT
concerns. I urge governments to work
towards this goal.
We must acknowledge the magnificent efforts of Abbey Chikane, chairman
of the Kimberley Process, and Rina-Louise Pretorious, of the South African
Foreign Affairs Department, whose leadership of the Kimberley Process and
administrative skills have helped maintain the necessary momentum.
In addition, it would be remiss of me not to acknowledge the role and
commitment of the NGOs that have been so instrumental in bringing our attention
to this issue and showing the way forward in seeking a solution. Charmian Gooch and Alex Yearsley of Global
Witness, Ian Smillie and Ralph Hazleton of Partnership Africa Canada and Rory
Anderson of World Vision, amongst others, deserve our respect for the
intelligent, forthright and constructive way they have engaged with industry.
Finally, we should not forget the ongoing, and I hope successful,
legislative campaign in the United States, led by Congressman Tony Hall and his
supporters in Washington. The WDC has,
from the outset, called for government legislation and we support the Clean
Diamonds Act. Eli and others have been
tireless in their lobbying efforts in Washington and I trust the current delay
in the Senate will be resolved swiftly to the satisfaction of all parties.
What we deplore, however, is unsubstantiated allegations that a link
exists between terrorism and the diamond industry. Government sources on both sides of the Atlantic have indicated
that their intelligence agencies have found no evidence to show that a link
exists and it is irresponsible to alarm the American consumer – so vital to our
business, but understandably emotionally vulnerable – with such scare
stories. Let the industry be fully
aware, however, that the possibility of any such connection, even inadvertently,
makes it of paramount importance that we all ensure our suppliers are beyond
reproach.
Each of us has differing needs and priorities, but we all now share the
same objectives: an end to the trade in conflict diamonds, the protection of
the legitimate diamond industry, the preservation of the integrity of our
beautiful product and, above all, the retention of consumer confidence.
So it is time for our industry to finish the job, to capitalise on the
progress we have made to date. Time to
turn words into action, our proposals into binding and effective
self-regulation.
Never was there a time when the world’s attention has been so focussed
on the activities of the diamond industry.
We are clearly in the spotlight and we must not flinch or turn away.
Above and beyond the measures contained in the Kimberley Process, the
international community demands, quite rightly, that the diamond industry takes
more responsibility for itself.
Credible and effective self-regulation is what is required. No gimmicks, no empty gestures.
The system of warranties, as proposed by the WDC and now enshrined in
the Kimberley Process document to be placed before the United Nations, meets
that requirement.
It complements and strengthens the international certification regime
that awaits ratification by the General Assembly. It is a fair, equitable and transparent form of self-regulation
that – as required by the Assembly – will not place undue burden on the
industry. It will not only provide
assurance amongst ourselves on the integrity of rough diamond supplies, but
will, most importantly, significantly increase consumers’ confidence that the
diamonds they buy have come from non-conflict sources.
Some might think that the tentative peace in Sierra Leone, or recent
developments in Angola, mean that we can relax, slow the pace a little, or even
go back to ‘how it always used to be’.
They must think again, because
there is no going back.
There can be no going back to the days when rebel movements, malicious
criminal organisations and individuals were able to become parasites on our
industry and, through the lack of simple but effective controls, able to fund
their ruinous activities with impunity.
I very much hope other mineral resource and extractive industries will
follow the example of the Kimberley Process and act to protect their businesses
from this menace.
Courage and vision has brought us this far. We must now go that extra mile if we are not to waste the
opportunity to demonstrate that gathered here today are leaders of an industry
who wish to embrace the challenges and values of the 21st Century,
and to establish a modern, transparent diamond industry, robust in its ethical
practices.
That is why I commend to you the system of warranties, to be
implemented without delay throughout our industry, to protect our business and
to bring to an end this abhorrent association of diamonds – our unique and
wonderful product – with human suffering and war.
Thank you.
© 1999-2003 All Rights Reserved, World Diamond Council Assn.
52 Vanderbilt Avenue / 19th Floor / New York, NY 10017 / USA